|
ULTRASONIC STRESS MEASUREMENT WITH
THE LCR TECHNIQUE |
Copyright Ó Don E. Bray
The LCR ultrasonic technique indicates stress through the acoustoelastic principle where small variations in strain affect the wave speed. By measuring the wave speed (or travel-time between known points) the change in stress can be calculated. Other material variations such as texture and temperature also affect the travel-time. The investigator using the LCR method must be aware of these other effects so that the best data indicative of stress variation is obtained.
The relationship of measured LCR wave travel-time change and the corresponding uniaxial stress is given by:
where
is change in stress,
E is Young’s modulus, and L is the acoustoelastic constant for
longitudinal waves propagating in the direction of the applied stress field,
as given in Table 1. Travel-time change (D t) is
the measured travel-time (t) minus the reference travel-time (to).
The reference travel-time t0 is a property of the probe sensor
spacing for an assumed stress free material.
Table 1. Typical values for acoustoelastic constant (L)
| Material | Load | L |
| Pearlitic steel | Tension | -2.38 |
| Compression | -2.45 | |
| 4140 steel | Tension 2.25 MHz | -2.2 |
| Tension 5 MHz | -2.36 | |
| Clear acrylic – aircraft grade | Tension | -2.14 |
Temperature induced speed changes occur both
in the material being investigated and in the probe material. The relationship
of wave speed and temperature (dc/dT) is given by:
where kT is the constant for a particular material, as given in Table 2.
| Table 2. | Temperature effects on |
| wave speed. |
| Material | kT |
| PMMA | -2.3 |
| Pearlitic Steel | -0.55 |
The effect of temperature on travel-time will be
(3)
where d is the travel distance in the material and D
T is the measured temperature change. Obviously, the temperature effect
for the PMMA wedge material is greater than that of the steel. Where data
are collected under moderately uniform temperature conditions, the temperature
effect, D t, can be ignored. For large temperature
variations, the temperature of the wedge can be monitored with a thermocouple.
The distance of wave travel in the wedge can be measured and a suitable
correction in the travel-time can be made.
Texture as typically encountered in cold-rolled plates and other structural shapes can have a significant affect on the wave speed. While the affect of texture on the LCR wave speed is less than that encountered by the shear waves often used in acoustic-birefringence stress measurements, there still is concern about the effects.
Special data collection procedures may be used
to minimize the effects of texture. In many items where stress is a concern,
the texture may be uniform throughout. In these cases, LCR travel-times
taken with the probe always at the same orientation relative to the geometry
of the item may be free of texture variation. In this case, the major effect
may be stress. This has been found to be true for plates and welded plates.
However, there is a need for more data on additional structures and shapes before
this assumption may be more widely made.
Characteristics of the LCR Pulse
Ideally, the LCR pulse is a true, nondispersive wave travelling at the longitudinal wave speed of the material. There are shape and material effects, however, that can cause dispersion of the wave. In many of these cases, the wave can still be used for stress measurement by the careful operator, and by choosing the proper probe.
Wave-guide effects are one of the most serious causes of dispersion. These occur in plates and pipes when the wavelength of the wave approaches some fraction of the thickness. Typically, when the ratio of plate thickness to wavelength is ten or above, there is no risk of any waveguide effect. Satisfactory results have been obtained with rations of five, however. Texture effects, discussed above, and grain boundary scattering also affects the pulse shape. Waveguide effects are the easiest to eliminate due to knowledge of the geometry. Texture may be evaluated with a contact shear wave acting across the thickness. Grain boundary scattering may be evaluated with attenuation measurements also across the boundary. There are no data yet on acceptable ranges for LCR stress measurement, however.
Choosing the proper reference location within
the LCR pulse can enable the collection of reliable data. Typically,
the second positive zero crossing at the first arrival of the pulse is used
as this reference. In nondispersive conditions, this location is easy to identify
at all pulse arrivals. Under dispersive conditions, however, identification
may be more difficult. In difficult circumstances, identification can be aided
by sliding a receiver probe along the travel path and observing the change of
shape.
Experimental Procedure for LCR Technique
Typical stress induced travel-time changes are small, at approximately 0.01%. Thus, travel-time variations caused by the testing procedure must be reduced to at least one tenth of level for the desired stress resolution. Testing procedure variations can arise from the instrumentation and the repeatability of the ultrasonic probe system. Instrumentation capable of measuring arrival times of a least a nanosecond is needed for good resolution. Further, probe repeatability at a designated location should be in the 2 to 3 ns range.
The nominal relationship of stress variation and travel-time for steel is shown in Fig. 1. The outer lines show the range for an expected measurement variation of ± 3 ns.
| Figure 1. | Typical relationship of stress change with travel-time change for |
| steel. Outer lines show variations with ± 3ns system repeatability. |
Setting up the Load Frame and Probe
The load frame shown in Fig. 2 is designed to
use magnets for force attraction to steel samples. Other devises such as vacuum
and mechanical constraints can be used. A hydraulic ram is fitted on the top
of the probe to provide a variable force at the couplant interface between the
probe and the test sample. The force line of the ram is midway between the two
receiving probes (R1 and R2), giving uniform pressure on these two interfaces.
Pressure on the ram is indicated by the pressure gauge on the hydraulic pump.
Figure 2. Load frame with hydraulic pump, piston, temperature indicator and
LCR probe.
Obtaining the higher pressures required for achieving small travel-time variations is dependent on good magnetic coupling. This requires that the magnets be firmly placed on the plate, and that the frame be able to move freely on the posts. If this condition is not met, the magnets will pull loose from the plate when the piston force is applied. Some adjustment of the magnet position and the collar placement is often needed to achieve good quality data.
To setup the load frame, follow the steps in
Table 3.
Collecting
LCR Travel-Time using a High Speed Digitizing Card, Lab
View and a Tandem Receiver Probe – Dual Channel Mode
Since the LCR wave travels underneath the surface at bulk, longitudinal wave speed, it will be the first arriving wave at receivers along its path. The change in travel-time of the wave will be indicative of the stress change. The stress induced travel-time changes are small, however, and very accurate and precise methods are required to accomplish this measurement. The following is a description of a suitable data collection method using a high speed digitizing card and an appropriate interface program on a personal computer.
| Step | Action |
| 1 | Position the collars on the posts so that the tops of the collars are at about 159 mm (6.25 in) from the plate. |
| 2 | Place the top frame on the posts and secure the top collars with about 1-mm of clearance between the collar and the frame. |
| 3 | Place the frame in position on the plate, and turn on the magnets. |
| 4 | Assure that the contact areas on the probe and the plate are clean and apply couplant to the probe contact areas. |
| 5 | Insert the probe, and position the sliding plate over the ram. |
| 6 | Apply hydraulic pressure to secure the probe in place. This should be in the range from 200 to 300 psi. |
A variety of measurement systems may be used for collecting LCR data. Typical systems include a commercial ultrasonic pulser/receiver as well as an oscilloscope and the LCR transducer, as shown in Fig. 3. The oscilloscope may be a stand-alone unit, such as LeCroy digital oscilloscope, or a high speed digitizing board (Gage Scope 265) inserted in a personal computer. If the high speed digitizing board is used, the computer must be fitted with suitable software, such as Lab View, so that the travel-time measurements can be made. The instrument must be able to resolve arrival-times in the 0.1 to 0.01 ns range. The pulse originates as the pulser/receiver emits a spike that excites the oblique sending transducer (T). The pulse travels as a LCR wave through a short distance in the material, and is received by the two transducers (R1 and R2) which are arranged in tandem. In some cases, a preamplifier is inserted in the R2 line to increase the signal amplitude. For a probe spacing d (R2 – R1) of 152.4 mm (6 in.), the initial travel time in a stress-free state between the two tandem transducers is about 25.7 m s. With an instrumentation resolution of 0.1 ns, the system with the probe is capable of measuring travel-time changes of approximately 0.0004%.
The time resolution (precision) of the high-speed digitizing card is a function of the sampling rate. Lab View enables the presentation of a typical oscilloscope screen on the computer monitor. While the presentation is similar to that of an oscilloscope, there are significant differences that need to be discussed.
The parameter START on LabView is analogous to
DELAY on a typical oscilloscope or ultrasonic flaw detector. NUMBER represents
the expansion of the time base of the display. The larger the positive value
in START, the later the start of the display after the trigger. The smaller
the NUMBER value, the fewer points displayed, and the greater the time expansion
of the time-base (i. e. smaller m s/div). The SAMPLING
RATE represents the firing rate of the card, which is associated with the maximum
time resolution of the system. Note that for dual channel operation, the ACTUAL
SAMPLING RATE per channel is one-half of the maximum SAMPLE RATE. POINTS (lower,
left corner of screen) describes the total number of points displayed on the
screen.
Fig 3. Data Collecting System
Typical steps in collecting LCR data are as follows:
The display (Fig. 4) shows the main bang at the
left and both the channel A and channel B traces. The bottom trace is Channel
A (receiver R1) and the top trace is Channel B (receiver R2). The LCR
wave is the earliest arrival in both traces.

| Figure 4. | Lab View dual channel display of LCR arrivals. R1 – Channel A shown by lower, black |
| trace, and R2; – Channel B shown by upper, white trace. (click for larger image) |
For measuring arrival time
at R1
The purpose here is to adjust the START and NUMBER settings to expand the LCR arrival at R1 so that the arrival time can be measured to its maximum precision. The necessary controls are ZOOM, identified by the magnifying glass located in the small menu box to the left, below the oscilloscope display, and the oscilloscope MOUSE which is the diamond to the right, at the bottom of the display.
The steps are:
Note that the expanded display of the LCR wave should be on the screen, and the cursor for Channel A should be aligned with the horizontal trace of the signal. This may be preset to the -30 V line. If the cursor is not correctly aligned, it can be reset in step 7 below.
| Fig. 5. | Expanded R1 arrival, with oscilloscope cursor line |
| at second positive zero crossing. |
In this case, the attention is directed to the second trace (Channel B). The amplification (V) for channel B should be adjusted so that the amplitudes of the LCR wave in A and B is approximately the same. A typical arrival pulse is shown in Fig. 6.
| Figure 6. | Typical pulse arrival at R2, with second positive |
| zero crossing indicated by computer cursor. |
Higher precision will be achieved it all data
are collected in single channel mode, using Channel A. This is due to the fact
that in dual channel mode, the higher speed sampling rate is divided between
the two channels so that the actual rate is one half of the peak. In single
channel mode, the actual sampling rate is the maximum. A higher speed board
than the one used here could give satisfactory performance in dual channel mode.
Nondestructive Evaluation, Revised Edition, with Rod K. Stanley, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, January 1997.
JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS
Bray, D. E., Pathak , N. and Srinivasan, M. N., "Residual Stress Mapping in a Steam Turbine Disk Using the Lcr Ultrasonic Technique," Materials Evaluation, Vol. 54, No. 7, 832-839, 1996.
Leon-Salamanca, T. and Bray, D.E., "Residual Stress Measurements in Steel Plates and Welds Using Critically Refracted (LCR) Waves," Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 7, No. 4, 169-184, 1996.
Bray, D.E. and Junghans, P.G., "Applications of the LCR Ultrasonic Technique for Evaluation of Post-Weld Heat Treatment in Steel Plates," NDT&E International, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 235-242, 1995.
Srinivasan, M.N., Chundu, S.N., Bray, D.E., and Alagarsamy, A., "Ultrasonic Technique for Residual Stress Measurement in Ductile Iron Continuous Cast Round Bars," Journal of Test and Evaluation, Vol. 20, No. 5, September 1992, pp. 331-335.
Srinivasan, M.N., Chundu, S.N., Bray, D.E., and Alagarsamy, A., "Detection of Stress in Ductile Iron Bars Using Critically Refracted Longitudinal Wave Techniques," AFS (American Foundry Society) Transactions, Vol. 92, No. 114, 1992, pp. 309-312.
Srinivasan, M., Bray, D.E., Junghans, P., and Alagarsamy, A., "Critically Refracted Longitudinal Waves Technique: A New Tool for the Measurement of Residual Stresses in Castings," AFS (American Foundrymen Society) Transactions, Vol. 91, No. 157, 1991, pp. 265-267.
Bray, D.E. and Leon-Salamanca, T., "Zero-Force Travel-Time Parameters of Ultrasonic Head-Waves in Railroad Rail," Materials Evaluation, Vol. 43, No. 7, June 1985, pp. 854-858, 863.
Egle, D.M. and Bray, D.E., "Ultrasonic Measurement of Longitudinal Rail Stresses," Materials Evaluation, vol. 378, No. 4, March 1979, pp. 41-46, 55.
Egle D.M. and Bray, D.E., "Measurements of Acoustoelastic and Third Order
Elastic Constants for Rail Steel," Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America Vol. 60, No. 3, September 1976, pp. 741-744.
CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
Bray, Don E. and Srinivasan, M. N., "Near-Surface and Through-Thickness Residual Stress Evaluation in Ductile Iron Using the Critically Refracted Longitudinal Wave Technique, Paper No. 97-AA-68, Presented at the ASME-ASIA ’97 Congress & Exhibition, Singapore, 30 September – 2 October, 1997.
Bray, Don E., and Dietrich, M., "Stress Evaluation in High Speed Rotating Machinery with the LCR Ultrasonic Technique," Proceedings of the 26th Turbo Machinery Symposium, Bailey, Jean C., Tech. Ed., Texas A&M University, Houston, Texas, 16-18 September 1997, pp. 143 -149
Bray, Don E., and Tang, W., "Evaluating Stress Gradients in Steel Plates and Bars with the LCR Ultrasonic Wave," Approximate Methods in the Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessels and Piping Components, Proceedings 1997 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, W. J. Bees, Ed., Orlando, FL, July 1997, PVP-Vol. 347, pp. 157-164.
Bray, D. E., Tang, W. and Grewal, D., "Ultrasonic Stress Evaluation in a Turbine/Compressor Rotor," Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Brunswick College, Brunswick, ME, July 28- August 2, 1996, pp. 1691-1697.
Tang, W., and Bray, D. E., "Stress and Yielding Studies Using Critically Refracted Longitudinal Waves," NDE Engineering Codes and Standards and Material Characterization, Proceedings 1996 ASME Pressure Vessels Piping Conference, Montreal, PQ, July 1996. PVP-Vol. 322, NDE-Vol. 15, J. F. Cook, Sr., C. D. Cowfer, and C. C. Monahan, Eds. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp. 41-48.
Bray, D. E., Srinivasan, M., and Pathak, N., "Residual Stress Distributions in a Steam Turbine Disk using the LCR Ultrasonic Technique," Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium of Nondestructive Characterization of Materials, Prague, Czech Republic, June 19-22, 1995, A. Bartos, R. E. Green, Jr. And C. O. Ruud, Eds., Transtec Publications, Lebanon, NH 03766, pp. 317-324.
Bray, D.E. and Junghans, P.G., "Application of the LCR Ultrasonic Technique for Evaluation of Post-Weld Heat Treatment in Steel Plates," NDE-Vol.-13, NDE for the Energy Industry 1995, Proceedings The Energy Sources Technology Conference and Exhibition, 1995, Houston, Texas, pp. 63-71.
Bray, D.E. and Srinivasan, M., "The LCR Ultrasonic Technique for Stress Measurement and Material Characterization," Proceedings International Petroleum Industry Inspection III, Topical Conference, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, June 1993, pp. 117-121.
Tang, W. and Bray, D.E., "Macro-Stress and Materials Characterization Studies in Composite by the LCR Ultrasonic Technique," Nondestructive Evaluation, PD-Vol. 54, NDE-Vol. 11, Proceedings 16th Annual Energy-Sources Technology Conference, Houston, TX, January/February 1993, pp. 53-60.
Pathak, N., Bray, D.E., and Srinivasan, M.N., "Detection of Stress in a Turbine Using the LCR Ultrasonic Technique," Serviceability of a Petroleum, Process and Power Equipment, PVP-Vol. 239/MPC-Vol. 33, Proceedings 1992 ASME Pressure Vessels Piping Conference, New Orleans, LA, June 1992, pp. 1-3.
Junghans, P. and Bray, D., "Beam Characteristics of High Angle Longitudinal Waves Probes," NDE: Applications, Advanced Methods, Codes and Standards, PVP-Vol. 216, NDE Vol. 9, Proceedings 1991 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, San Diego, CA, June 1991, pp. 39-44.
Chundu, S., Srinivasan, M., and Bray, D., "Residual Stress Measurement in Ductile Cast Iron Using The LCR Ultrasonic Technique," NDE: Applications, Advanced Methods, Codes and Standards, PVP-Vol. 216, NDE Vol. 9, Proceedings 1991 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, San Diego, CA, June 1991, pp. 49-54.
Leon-Salamanca, T. and Bray, D.E., "Ultrasonic Measurement of Residual Stress in Steels Using Critically Refracted Longitudinal Waves (LCR)," Proceedings 1990 Spring Conference on Experimental Mechanics, June 1990, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 271-278.
Bray, D.E., "Application of Critically Refracted Ultrasonic Waves for Petroleum Industry Inspection," Proceedings Petroleum Industry Inspection Technology, Topical, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Houston, TX, June 1989, pp. 157-161.
Bray, D.E., Leon-Salamanca, T., and P. Junghans, "Applications of the LCR Ultrasonic Technique for Evaluating Post Weld Heat Treatment in Steel Plate," in Streit, R., ed., Nondestructive Evaluation NDE Planning and Application, NDE 5, Proceedings 1989 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Honolulu, HI, July 1989, pp. 191-197.
Leon-Salamanca, T., Reinhart, E., Bray, D.E., and Golis, M., "Field Applications of an Ultrasonic Method for Stress Measurement in Structure," in Boogaard, J. and Van Dijk, G., eds., Nondestructive Testing (Proceedings 12th World Conference), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 1989, pp. 1484-1489.
Leon-Salamanca, T., and Bray, D.E., "Application of Ultrasonic P-Wave for Nondestructive Stress Measurement," Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Las Vegas, NV, November 1985.
Leon-Salamanca, T., and Bray, D.E., "Mean Travel-time for Zero-Force Determination in Railroad Rails Using P-Waves," Proceedings of the 15th Symposium on NDE, San Antonio, TX, April 1985.
Bray, D.E. and Egle, D.M., "Field Tests on the Use of Ultrasonic Wave Velocity Changes to Detect Longitudinal Stress Variations in Railroad Rail," Conference on Nondestructive Techniques for Measuring the Longitudinal Force in Rails, Federal Railroad Administration/Association of American Railroad, Washington, D.C., February 1979, FRA/ORD-80-50, June 1980.
Bray, D.E. and Egle, D.M., "Residual Stress Measurement in Railroad Rail," Proceedings of a Workshop in Nondestructive Evaluation of Residual Stress, NTIAC-76-2, Nondestructive Testing Information Analysis Center, San Antonio, TX, 1975, pp. 187-195.
King, R.R., Birdwell, J.A., Clotfelter, W.N., Risch, E.R., and Bray, D.E.,
"Improved Methods for Nondestructive Measuring Residual Stress in Railway
Wheels," Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on NDE, San Antonio, TX,
April 1973, pp. 91-105.
PRESENTATIONS: (5 years)
Bray, Don E., "Application of Ultrasonic Stress Measurement to Engineering Components," Pres. No. 2Aea3, Invited presentation to 134th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, San Diego, California, 2 Dec. 1997.
Tang, W., and Bray, D. E., "Ultrasonic Measurements in Elastic and Plastic Strain in Steels," International Chemical and Petroleum Industry Inspection Technology, V Topical, Houston, Texas, The American Society for Nondestructive Testing, June 16-18, 1997.
Bray, D. E., "Ultrasonic Inspection using the LCR and M21 Techniques," Invited Lecture, Fraunhofer Institute, Saarbrucken, Germany. June 1995.
Bray, D. E., Srinivasan, M., and Pathak, N., "Residual Stress Mapping in a Turbine Disk using the LCR Ultrasonic Technique," Seventh International Symposium of Nondestructive Characterization of Materials, Prague, Czech Republic, June 19-22, 1995.
Bray, D.E., "Effects of Load Variation on Ultrasonic Wave Speed in Composite Materials," CARP Classic Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, February 1994.
TECHNICAL REPORTS
Egle, D.M. and Bray, D.E., "Nondestructive Measurement of Longitudinal Rail stresses, Application of the Acoustoelastic Effect to Rail Stress Measurement," DOT Report FRA/ORD-77/34 I, PB-281-164/AS, January 1978, 113 pages.
Egle, D.M. and Bray, D.E., "Nondestructive Measurement of Longitudinal Rail Stresses," DOT/FRA Report No. FRA/ORD-76-270, PB-272-061, July 1976, 193 pages.